Will it actually look like my child?
The only honest way to answer that is to show it - on the cases that usually go wrong, not the ones that always go right.
Deep brown skin, tightly coiled hair
age 5It is the first case we check: the skin tone, the short tightly coiled hair and the gap in his front teeth all held on both passes.






| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Skin tone still deep brown | Held | Held |
| Hair still very short and tightly coiled | Held | Held |
| The gap in his front teeth is still there | Held | Held |
Fine, fair, barely-there hair
age 1The hardest case there is, because a near-bald baby is what a drawing most wants to "correct". A parent reviewing a rival product described exactly that: their one-year-old came back with long thick black hair, when she barely has any and it is blonde.









What to notice: Re-run after we wrote down that an absence is part of the likeness: the eyes stay blue and she still reads as a baby on both passes.
| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Still almost bald | Partly | Partly |
| What hair there is stays fine and fair | Held | Partly |
| Eyes still blue | Held | Held |
| Still reads as a baby, not a toddler | Held | Held |
Straight black hair with a fringe
age 7A fringe is a specific shape, and it is the sort of detail that gets averaged away.






What to notice: The one difference between the passes is the hair colour: pass 2 is black, pass 1 reads as a warm dark brown. Side by side it is obvious; on its own you would not notice. This is the kind of drift two passes exist to surface.
| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| The fringe still sits above the eyebrows | Held | Held |
| Hair still straight and black, not waved or browned | Partly | Held |
| Recognisably the same child in both passes | Held | Held |
Curly ginger hair and freckles
age 4Freckles and red hair are the first things smoothed into something more average. If they are still there twelve chapters later, the identity lock is doing its job.






| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Freckles still on the cheeks | Held | Held |
| Hair still ginger and curly | Held | Held |
| Eyes still green | Held | Held |
Round glasses
age 6Glasses are an object rather than a feature, and objects are what gets added and removed most freely - the same failure mode as a hair clip or a hearing aid. Either they are there, the same shape, or they are not.






| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| The glasses are still there | Held | Held |
| Frames still round, not rectangular | Held | Held |
| Hair still light brown and straight | Held | Held |
Long braids with beads
age 8A second dark-skinned case with a completely different hair structure to the first, because "we got dark skin right once" is not the same claim as "we carry hair structure". Braids also have a length and a count, which is harder to fake than a colour.






| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Braids still long, not shortened | Held | Held |
| Beads still on the ends | Held | Held |
| Skin tone unchanged | Held | Held |
| Still reads as eight, not five | Held | Held |
A visible hearing aid
age 5The case that matters most to the family it belongs to, and the one most likely to be tidied away. A child who wears a hearing aid and does not see it in her own book has been told something about herself.









What to notice: After the fix, with a worn item named as part of the person and the side of the head stated, the hearing aid is there in both portraits, on the right ear, and in the first story scene with the hair tucked back so it can be seen.
| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| The hearing aid is still there | Held | Held |
| Still visible once she is in a story scene | Held | Lost |
| Hair still short and dark | Held | Held |
A baby with no hair
6 monthsThe hardest case in the set: a six-month-old has no hair, no teeth and few fixed features to hold on to, so this is where a toddler is most likely to be drawn instead.









What to notice: Re-run after the fix: the skin tone is right on both passes, and he is still recognisably this baby and still a baby. Nothing goes to a printer until you have seen it and said yes.
| What had to survive | Pass 1 | Pass 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Still no hair | Partly | Partly |
| Skin tone unchanged | Held | Held |
| Still reads as an infant, not a toddler | Held | Held |
| Eyes still dark brown | Held | Held |
How the likeness is held across twelve chapters
The photo is used to draw a single reference character. Every later illustration - the cover and all twelve chapter pictures - is generated from that character, not from the photo again. That is the reason the child does not drift page to page, and it is also why the photo is not needed for long: it is deleted automatically seven days after upload.
Each book has one hero whose name is on the cover, and on our family stories up to four people, each drawn from their own photo. Siblings who each want to be the hero get a book each.
If you arrived here because the options on other sites never quite matched your child, the decision itself is written up separately: what actually has to match, and how to check it before you pay.
How we tested this
Eight cases, each one a feature that is known to get lost. For every case we wrote down what had to survive before running it, then ran the same reference photograph through our ordinary process twice, independently, and judged both outputs against that list. Every image here is the first output of its pass - nothing was generated repeatedly and then picked from, and the second pass is published whether it agrees with the first or not. Three cases were re-run on 24 August after we changed our process to fix what the first run exposed; their pre-fix pictures are still on the page underneath the new ones, because "we fixed it" with only the good result showing is a claim rather than evidence. Every criterion and both passes are in the tables on this page.
The criteria came first. For each case we wrote down the two to four things that had to survive before generating anything, phrased so that “held” or “lost” is a matter of looking rather than taste - a fringe is either above the eyebrows or it is not. A criterion invented after seeing the picture is not a test, it is a caption.
The same reference, twice. Each case was run through our process two times independently from one reference photograph, and both results are on this page. That is there to answer the obvious objection - that we generated until it worked - because an inconsistency between the passes is visible to you rather than only to us. Where the two passes disagree, the table says so.
It is our own process, unchanged. The same steps and settings that draw a real customer’s book. Nothing was hand-retouched, nothing was upscaled, and no image was regenerated and swapped in.
The one test that settles it for your child costs nothing: upload their photograph and read the cover and first chapter free. If the child on the page is not recognisably them, tell us and we will redraw it, as many times as it takes.
Common questions
Will the book actually look like my child?
That is what this page exists to let you judge before you spend anything. The illustration keeps skin tone, hair colour, hair texture, eye colour and face shape from the photo you upload, and holds them across all twelve chapters. You see the cover and first chapter free, so you can decide on the likeness before paying.
What makes a good photo to upload?
One clear photo of the face, looking towards the camera, in daylight, with nobody else in frame. A phone photo is ideal. Avoid sunglasses, hats that hide the hairline, heavy shadow, and screenshots of a screen - a screenshot loses the detail the illustration is built from.
Does it work for every skin tone and hair type?
That is what the cases on this page test, and they were chosen because they are the ones most often drawn wrong: deep brown skin with tightly coiled hair, long braids with beads, a baby with no hair at all, a fringe, freckles, glasses. Every criterion and both passes are in the tables on this page. We publish the hard cases rather than the easy ones.
What did the re-run change?
A worn item is now named as part of the person, with the side of the head stated, and an absence is named as part of the likeness. Both are written into how every book is drawn.
Are these real children?
No, and deliberately. The reference portraits are generated, not photographs of real children, so that no real child’s face is published on a page about how we handle children’s photos. Everything after the reference is our normal production process, unchanged.
What if the likeness is not right when I see my book?
If the child on the page does not look like yours, tell us and we will redraw it - as many times as it takes, before anything is printed. Because each book is made for one named child we fix rather than refund, and we do not put a limit on fixing.
Why does each book star only one child?
Each book has one hero whose name is on the cover - that is a choice about whose story it is, not a limit. We used to say the illustration blends two children together; we tested that across 88 illustrations at two, three and four people and found no blending and no swapped faces, so the family stories now hold up to four. Siblings and twins still get a book each.
Last updated:
Judge it on your own child’s photo - the first chapter is free.
Browse the collection